Comments on: What Comes After Incorporation? http://www.eckernet.com/2009/10/what_comes_after_incorporation.html Pissing you off and making you laugh since 2002 Wed, 04 Jan 2012 10:55:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Kevin http://www.eckernet.com/2009/10/what_comes_after_incorporation.html/comment-page-1#comment-5480 Kevin Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:06:02 +0000 http://www.eckernet.com/?p=4050#comment-5480 No it did not, and <a href="http://www.eckernet.com/2008/06/heller_review.html" rel="nofollow">as I wrote at the time</a>, that was my major disagreement with the ruling. As I wrote that, I figured we'd be right back at the same time in the future. Well here we are. No it did not, and as I wrote at the time, that was my major disagreement with the ruling.

As I wrote that, I figured we’d be right back at the same time in the future. Well here we are.

]]> By: J. Ewing http://www.eckernet.com/2009/10/what_comes_after_incorporation.html/comment-page-1#comment-5479 J. Ewing Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:42:04 +0000 http://www.eckernet.com/?p=4050#comment-5479 Didn't Heller provide us with some definition of the boundaries of "reasonable"? If it didn't, even a favorable ruling here is likely to help much. Didn’t Heller provide us with some definition of the boundaries of “reasonable”? If it didn’t, even a favorable ruling here is likely to help much.

]]>