Whenever someone hits me, I'm all like 'I'm gonna pop a cap in yo' ass!', but it comes out sounding like 'Owwww!

« | Home | »

HR 257 – Child Gun Safety and Gun Access Prevention Act of 2009

February 20th, 2009 by Kevin

This is the fourth of the series, you can see the rest here.

HR 257 – Child Gun Safety and Gun Access Prevention Act of 2009
To prevent children\’s access to firearms.
Sponsor : Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee (D – TX18)
Co-Sponsor : NONE

Current Status : Referred to the Judiciary Subcommittee on the Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security (2/9/2009)
Full Text

Summary:

The title itself should sum this one up, and give a pretty good indication of the liklihood this is going to do a damn bit of good.  We all know how well simply telling a child they can\’t have something works.  Just look at how well that works with alcohol and drugs!  Mostly this bill is a load of crap, but there are a few minor redeeming qualities.

To start out with this bill raises the age limit for buying a handgun from 18 to 21, and prevents anyone under 21 from possessing an semiautomatic assault weapon and/or a large capacity ammunition feeding device.  The amusing part here is that, contrary to popular belief, there is no such thing as an \”assault weapon\”.  It simply does not exist, it\’s a term made up by liberals by which they mean \”a gun that looks extra scary\”.  It\’s also a bullshit term, because when liberals do attempt to define it they end up with a list that is self-contradictory and lacking in any consistent criteria.

Plus please define \”large capacity\”.  Personally when I\’m on the range I LIKE a large capacity magazine…saves me the hassle of having to reload all the time.  I came here to shoot, not to reload.  And if I\’m in a situation where I need to use a firearm in self defense, there is no such thing as large capacity.  I treasure every single bullet in that firearm.

Moreover simply banning them isn\’t going to be effective.  What are you attempting to accomplish??  Keeping them out of the hands of gang-bangers?  There are already laws against that but they don\’t work.  It\’s almost as if criminals don\’t care what the law says….weird I know.  Not to mention the sheer stupidity of this concept.  An 18 year old can be drafted, join the military, vote, gamble, buy porn, etc but he can\’t be trusted with a firearm???

This bill also prohibits keeping a firearm in even an unloaded state, if there is ANY chance of a child getting access to it.  So basically you can keep a firearm for self-defense until you have kids.  But once you bring your pride&joy home, you are not allowed to protect them.  It\’s absolutely stupid and darn near impossible to enforce, unless someone actually does use one to defend their kids….then you\’re gonna lock up the victim.  Brilliant move there.

Like I said, there are a couple redeeming qualities, although they are a duplication of effort at the expense of the taxpayer.

First, it allows the AG to provide grants to local law enforcement to provide gun safety programs for kids.  And it also asks school districts to participate in said gun safety programs.

Ok first of all gun safety programs already exist, and are funded by private industry.  Probably the best is the Eddie Eagle program run by the NRA.  An excellent program from young children that teachs kids about firearms without attempting to give them nightmares.  No reason to force the taxpayers to pay for what is a redundant program.

I do like the idea of asking school districts to participate in gun safety programs though.  In my opinion, it is irresponsible to not teach your children about firearms, whether you own one or not.  There is the possibility that they may come in contact with one….whether it be at a friends house or finding one somewhere.  They need to know how to handle the situation intelligently and safely.  In my opinion it ranks right up there with swimming lessons as a necessary skill to teach your kids when they are very young.

Overall this bill is absolutely worthless and needlessly hampers the use of firearms by otherwise responsible adults for no net benefit.  The few redeeming features of this bill already exist without asking the taxpayer to foot the bill.  Ask your legislator to do whatever they can to kill this bill.

Email This Post Email This Post | Print This Post Print This Post
Posted in This Is My Rifle, This Is My Gun | 6 Comments »

6 Responses

  1. EckerNet.Com » Blog Archive » Firearms Related Legislation Pending In Congress Says:

    [...] HR 257 – Child Gun Safety and Gun Access Prevention Act of 2009 [...]

  2. drunkguy Says:

    just me thinking out loud here… if they raise the age from 18 – 21… how do they justify giving a firearm to the service men and women who are under the age of 21?

  3. Mrs Marcos Says:

    Where is it legal to drink at age 18 in the United States?

  4. Night Writer Says:

    The education establishment insists that sex ed is a basic and essential need that is too important to be left to parents to teach at home. Kids must be educated because well, you know they’re going to do it anyway and it’s best they learn the facts for their own protection, free from their parents’ prejudices.

    Meanwhile, they’ll insist on zero-tolerance “abstinence” programs for firearms even though uneducated exposure to guns can have just as devastating (if not more) consequences for the kids and their classmates. The establishment seems to think that if you teach kids to shoot and safely handle firearms you’ll only encourage them to shoot each other. Somehow this same reasoning doesn’t apply to sex ed.

    Personally, as a parent, I see both kinds of instruction as my responsbility and nothing the schools need to be involved in. If there’s one thing I think the education establishment and I can agree on, however, it’s that kids shouldn’t get their education on sex and guns from watching tv and the movies.

  5. Kevin Says:

    Mrs Marcos, sorry, my line of thought was still drifting back the previous point about how laws don’t keep kids from drinking if they want to.

    Post modified.

  6. J. Ewing Says:

    Given Representative hypen-Lee (D-Kookville) as the sponsor, I can easily imagine what the “gun safety education” will consist of: “If your parents have a gun, turn them in to the local police before they shoot you with it.”

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.