<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cautious Optimism About The Upcoming Immigration Vote</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eckernet.com/2007/09/cautious_optimism_about_the_upcoming_immigration_vote.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eckernet.com/2007/09/cautious_optimism_about_the_upcoming_immigration_vote.html</link>
	<description>Pissing you off and making you laugh since 2002</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 10:55:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Ewing</title>
		<link>http://www.eckernet.com/2007/09/cautious_optimism_about_the_upcoming_immigration_vote.html/comment-page-1#comment-3066</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Ewing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 14:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eckernet.com/2007/09/cautious_optimism_about_the_upcoming_immigration_vote.html#comment-3066</guid>
		<description>Coleman is always a reliable make-up-your-mind-such-as-it-is-at-the-last-moment kind of guy, which of course is hard on the nerves, but he&#039;s mostly reliable to principle.  That&#039;s 80% good and 20% bad, of course.

What concerns me about this vote, as far as Coleman goes, is that it is attached to a defense bill-- a great strategy by Dems that makes it tough for R&#039;s to vote against.

Even more worrisome is that I believe he holds to the principle that those who crossed the border illegally (or were born here of illegal parents) and have been &quot;contributing to society&quot; ever since shouldn&#039;t be penalized now.  They shouldn&#039;t be rewarded, either, IMO, but that&#039;s a moral quandary that Norm is trying to resolve, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coleman is always a reliable make-up-your-mind-such-as-it-is-at-the-last-moment kind of guy, which of course is hard on the nerves, but he&#8217;s mostly reliable to principle.  That&#8217;s 80% good and 20% bad, of course.</p>
<p>What concerns me about this vote, as far as Coleman goes, is that it is attached to a defense bill&#8211; a great strategy by Dems that makes it tough for R&#8217;s to vote against.</p>
<p>Even more worrisome is that I believe he holds to the principle that those who crossed the border illegally (or were born here of illegal parents) and have been &#8220;contributing to society&#8221; ever since shouldn&#8217;t be penalized now.  They shouldn&#8217;t be rewarded, either, IMO, but that&#8217;s a moral quandary that Norm is trying to resolve, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

