Yesterday, Alicia Colon of the NY Sun, wrote an article entitled Heroes and Cowards. In all honesty, it’s a very average article, however, it did start a commentorial* shitstorm** amongst the usual suspects*** with one paragraph in the middle of the article.
The total military dead in the Iraq war between 2003 and this month stands at about 3,133. This is tragic, as are all deaths due to war, and we are facing a cowardly enemy unlike any other in our past that hides behind innocent citizens. Each death is blazoned in the headlines of newspapers and Internet sites. What is never compared is the number of military deaths during the Clinton administration: 1,245 in 1993; 1,109 in 1994; 1,055 in 1995; 1,008 in 1996. That’s 4,417 deaths in peacetime but, of course, who’s counting?
Now the protests seem centered around the idea that she’s basically comparing apples and oranges, or if you hate vegans, steak and bratwurst. That those peacetime deaths (which are mostly things like accidents, illness, suicides, etc) are still happening and therefore the death toll is really much higher than 3133. I couldn’t immediatly find statistics on “peacetime” styled deaths after 1999 but it’s really beside the point.
The point she’s making is not that more military men and women die during peacetime than wartime (more on that later). The point she’s making is that we have to keep things in perspective.
If you’re not following me, I’ll explain. In a comparable “peacetime” period of time, we had 4417 military deaths. Yet that is probably the first time you’ve seen that number. Because most people didn’t get too excited about it. In the grand scheme of things it’s not that big of a number, almost that many people in the US drown annually. Basically, losing those thousands of soldiers, sad as it may be, is considered “normal”.
Yet, a number like 3133, receives near hysterical coverage, with weekly updates and almost constant use as a political weapon. That despite the fact that 4417 was “no big deal”. That’s what Colon is trying to say, it’s all a matter of perspective. If you once considered 4417 not worthy of notice, but now are putting up a virtual shitstorm over 3133, shouldn’t you perhaps examine your motives?? If your motives were really centered around the fate of those 3133 and their families, why were you not so concerned about the 4417 and their families?? If your concern were truly about the welfare of our soldiers, you would be more alarmed by the peacetime deaths than the wartime.
Now beware, one could look at those numbers and conclude that it is safer for our troops in Iraq than for them to be back home. However, that isn’t entirely accurate, as there are a vastly larger number of troops here at home than have been deployed in Iraq. Since troops levels are constantly changing I’m not sure it would be statistically valid to come up with a deaths per 1000 soldier comparison, for example. However, it’s probably also worth pointing out, without minimizing the danger in Iraq, that they are also in a controlled environment, which eliminates some of the factors that result in those “peacetime” deaths. However, don’t construe that as me saying that it’s better for them in Iraq. I have both friends and family over there right now, and I would definitely prefer if they were home.
Regardless, of any of that, yes she is comparing “apples to oranges” but her point isn’t that an apple is better than an orange. It’s that if a rotten apple in your pantry doesn’t bother you, why should a rotten orange?
*I declare this is a word, and hereby copyright it.
**I declare this is not really a word, but it sounds cool, so I’m gonna copyright it anyway.
***Dolts, lefties, moonbats, dumbasses, hate-America first crowd, people named “Bill”, hippies, Hollywood, NYC, union members, people between 72″ and74″ inches of height, etc
[H/T RWN for link]