Sometimes the irony is just too great not to notice. Today Mahmoud Komati, deputy chief of Hezbollah’s political arm, unwittedly provided proof of why Israel doing what it’s doing makes sense
“The truth is _ let me say this clearly _ we didn’t even expect (this) response…. that (Israel) would exploit this operation for this big war against us,” said Komati.
He said Hezbollah had expected “the usual, limited response” from Israel to the July 12 cross-border raid, in which three Israelis were killed.
They expected the usual PROPORTIONAL response. And obviously were okay with that because they did it anyway. So as long as Israel limited to proportional responses, they were going to keep up the terrorist attacks. I mean why not, just cause your enemy restrains themselves is no reason for you to!
This is exactly the reason Israel is justified in doing what it is doing. This is how war works, you hit your enemy so hard that in their eyes they are willing to do anything, including unconditional surrender, to stop the war. No war was ever won where the victor annoyed their enemy to defeat.
Some people appear to have forgotten how wars work. Which is why it was especially nice to see The American Thinker write up A Few of the Basics of War
8. During this period there is going to be violence. That is what war means. You can photograph it from every conceivable angle, and document every casualty. That does not change the fact that there is an aggressor - Hizbullah - and a defender - Israel. The end game of war is when the defender goes on the offensive to destroy the aggressor. The final stage of a war is when the defender appears to be the aggressor as it moves into the territory of the aggressor and burns out its black heart. That will be the final stage of the war. Then there will be peace.
Lasting peace…because the aggressor has realize that to continue being the aggressor carries with it consequences so horrible that they are unwilling to endure.
And for those of you still hung up on this ridiculous peacekeeping force idea
9. All recent history shows that there is no role for a “peacekeeping” force in a situation of military antagonism. The oldest of illusions is that the “presence” of a third force will in some way provide a deterrent factor - wrong.
[...]
Why? Because the peacekeeping force is not playing for keeps while the aggressor is. So it cannot work. The only solution is the destruction of the aggressor. Otherwise the logic of the aggressor is to keep up the aggression. The aggressor doesn’t want peace, he wants victory. The only way to block that is to inflict defeat on him. There is no third way.
Forcing peace upon people will result in temporary peace only. The factions have to work it out until there is a clear victor.
Let Israel accomplish it’s mission and perhaps they can achieve peace for themselves and their neighbors. God knows they deserve it.