NYT Drops Their Credibility…Again
January 17th, 2006 by 
Kevin
Two approaches to informing the public:
Using the journalistic process including the use of editors and “accountability”, we get this photo from the NYT.
OR
A blogger uses his own earned credibility to explain why it is obviously a fake staged photo.
Now why is it that the MSM keeps claim that blogs without editors are bad??
As Michelle Malkin suggests, the only way it could have been worse would have been something like this:
Pakistani men with the remains of a missile fired at a house in the Bajur tribal zone near the Afghan border.
And if you see anything wrong with that photo you obviously exist in a naziconservative echo chamber without any regard for true journalism.
Email This Post
| 
Print This Post
Posted in Main Stream Media | 
1 Comment »
January 17th, 2006 at 9:09 am
Are you kidding me? I mean, really, the NYT ran that pic? Un-freaking-believable!
Is it too much to ask that one of the 45 layers of editors would ask a question about this? Or just maybe they could hire a military expert to at least present the image that they are concerned about reporting the truth rather than damaging America’s reputation?!?!