PropagandaHype Failed?? Simple, Just Re-Hype It!!
September 26th, 2005 by
Kevin
It has pretty much become common knowledge that much of the hype and sensational reporting of massive death in New Orleans was false. Not only false but grossly over-exaggerated.
Facing that reality, Norwegianity has come up with a new tactic. Re-Hype it! Which apparently resulted in today’s post entitled “Many Katrina victims had gunshot wounds!“.
Many??? Really. Must not have read the source too well.
Most of the dead had drowned, Roper said. Others had died of dehydration, probably caused by abandonment, he said.
Well we know “most” did not die by gunshot….much less a gunshot to the head or back. So how much is “many”?? How can such a statement be made?? Well it apparently comes from this
He was surprised by the number of homicides — people with gunshot wounds to their heads and backs.
Which still fails to answer the question of “how much is many??”. Certainly no number is given or even hinted at. Simply somebody was surprised by the number. Well, speaking for myself, I would be surprised by one person shot in the head or back. So given the data, “many” could conceivably be “one”.
This is a single source, with no direct quote or number cited. We’ve seen nothing to confirm it. And we know “many” of the hype and rumors of mass-death/murder/rape/cannibalism/ninjas/deck-stacking/etc were mostly false.
So knowing all that, and with absolutely no data to support your claim, how can one claim any integrity and still use such a misleading title??
Well, having read past posts on Norwegianity, I suspect that as usual, sensational exaggerated propaganda was deemed more valuable that reality. Feel free to prove me wrong.
NOTE : As a followup to my previous post, don’t miss tomorrow’s post entitled “Cindy Sheehan has a HUGE criminal history!!”.
UPDATE : Response from Norweginity
Locally, I’m being accused of over-exaggerating the death toll. Sorry, I don’t mean to be asking questions during a time of plunging polls and resubmerged evidence.
The problem isn’t you posing of questions, nor does plunging polls have anything to do with it. It’s that fact that you knowingly make misleading statements without any measure of truth whatsoever. And you can’t claim “resubmerged evidence” since you have NO evidence whatsoever.
Basically as usually you completely missed the point and would prefer to stick to talking points.
Email This Post
|
Print This Post
Posted in News Roundup |
10 Comments »


