Rush Vs Blogosphere
August 7th, 2003 by
Kevin
The whole blogosphere has been talking about this article in The Hill, which basically states that blogs could never match up to Rush Limbaughs talk radio show as regards to impact. Predictably most of the blogosphere has been pissed off about this article and disagreeing with it. John Hawkins at RightWingNews even stole my thunder by writing a point-by-point critique of it about 4 hours before I planned on writing on. The guy is out to ruin me I think.
But anyway, Hawkins be damned I’m writing a rant. Mainly because I don’t share the same opinion as he does. I think it’s likely that no one blog will measure up to Rush. I’m not saying it’s impossible but I sort of doubt it. Although I will say that I think the political blogosphere as a whole will definitely outdo Rush regarding the impact it has.
So in general I agreed with the article….until I got to the four reasons Dr. David Hill used to supporting his theory. They are completely asinine. And despite Hawkins stealing my thunder I’m going blindly forward with my critique.
First, most bloggers don�t match what Rush calls �show prep.� Rush is almost always armed for his shows with reams of data and analysis from a wide variety of news and information sources. His commentaries indicate that he has actually read his sources, thought about their meaning, and prepared his own in-depth analyses before trying to persuade audience members during his three on-air hours each day.
Oh my lord, has this guy even read a blog? Most bloggers use a huge sum of data each day. I fully realize I do less research than many other bloggers but even I research something from many different angle before ever writing anything. Many bloggers write very well thought out essays on their topics. Bill Whittle of Eject! Eject! Eject! is a perfect example. His essays are long yes, but they are very well researched and well thought out.
By comparison, many bloggers� preparations for their stream-of-consciousness commentaries seem limited to reading the ruminations of other bloggers and scanning Internet news. Because some bloggers, even prominent ones, spend so much time writing throughout the entire day, they don�t research their own ideas well enough to be persuasive.
First of all do you realize how much information and data is only a keystroke away on the internet? You can search the internet for information a million times faster than any other media.
Plus his reasoning is what makes the blogosphere so powerful. Other people reading your thoughts, can look at the issue from another angle and perhaps improve or strike down a theory. Until as a whole the blogosphere has a very powerful statement and message coming across to it’s readers.
In addition, the vast numbers and widely diverse backgrounds of the blogosphere authors means that on almost any given topic there is likely an “expert” out there somewhere. By feeding off this ingrained knowledge other bloggers can help spread the message.
Second, Limbaugh is a master of production technique. Rush started in the radio business as a record-spinning disc jockey and understands the value of using punchy �bumper music� to open his segments, for example. Though Rush cares most about the message, he understands that the packaging is essential to the communication process.
By comparison, most bloggers seem oblivious to the production details that might polish their communication efforts. Few seem to care about the principles of effective Web design. Some even seem to consider the primitive style of their blogs a badge of honor.
This is the most pathetic point of all of them. I can almost guarantee this is the type of person who still things dozens of animated graphics all over a page is “cute”. When people are reading an essay on the blog pretty colors are the last thing they care about. Simplicity is better than anything else. You want to be able to access the information quickly and easily. Too many “features” can kill a blog.
Third, Limbaugh understands that entertainment value is essential to building a mass audience for political communication. His use of highly produced song parodies and other irreverent spoofs keeps a segment of his audience entertained that would desert him if he were �serious� 100 percent of the time. Some bloggers use humor effectively to punctuate their commentaries; few exhibit Limbaugh�s comedic skill, timing and wit.
Humor?? What the hell?? Now I know he’s never read a blog. First of all if you want humor Scrappleface, IMAO, and others provide plenty of it. John Hawkins has his ACPOTI (Anyone Can Post On The Internet) section which always leaves me in stiches. The Blogfather of Instapundit is always using witty comments to spice up his site and draw the audience in.
Fourth, Limbaugh builds bonds with his audience. He provides enough details about his personal life that loyal listeners know something about his parents, brother, wife, their cats, his golf game, his diet, his hearing problems, etc. Those revelations allow listeners to have a �friendship� relationship with Rush that solidifies their place in his daily audience. Though some nonpolitical bloggers write much about their personal lives, the most influential political bloggers reveal few intimate details about their personal lives, making it more difficult for their readers to bond with them.
Bonding? Once again ever read a blog?? In a blog you can interact with the author. And most people absolutely do. In the comments areas you can flesh out ideas with each other. Offer criticism or support for their ideas. My bloggers hold IM conversations about issues and then publish the transcripts. Many bloggers reveal details about their personal lives a great deal. Plus the blogosphere is essentially a community, with bloggers interacting both in discussing ideas and also in the general business of running a blog. Quit trying to make it so sterile.
There now that I’m knocked Dr. Hill for a loop let me tell you why I originally agreed with him. Blogs take time out of ones day, radio generally does not. Many people who listen to radio do it as a distraction or side event. They may be driving in the car, they may be at work and need something in the background to listen to, or they may be busy around the house and have the radio on to keep them company. It’s there, and you don’t have to take away your concentration. This makes it much easier to listen to. An audience is reached much easier.
Blogs, however, take time out of ones day. You have to stop what your doing and read the blog. Getting any sort of consensus requires reading more than one. Granted you can search for topics that interest you rather than what Rush forces upon you but it does take some special effort that radio does not.
Even Dr. Hill slightly acknowledges this point, while simultaneously seemingly destroying his.
Although estimates are that just 4 percent of the online community reads blogs, they are followed by a better-educated and more upscale, influential audience than that for talk radio.
But in the end I don’t expect any one blog to become more influential than Rush Limbaugh, although the blogosphere as a whole likely will. But then again is it really necessary? We’re not competing for the same audience. I personally would like to see Rush publish a text of his shows. Allow bloggers to reference and get his message out to an even wider audience…an audience that even Dr. Hill points out is “a better-educated and more upscale, influential audience”.
Email This Post
|
Print This Post
Posted in Events of the Blogosphere |
No Comments »